| Updated: Wed, Oct 24 1:48 PM EDT |
 A
man holds his baby as his wife eats lunch in
Istanbul's Eminonu district on the Bosporus on
Wednesday, Oct 24, 2001.
(AP) | | | By
SUZAN FRASER, Associated Press Writer
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) - Under Turkish law, the man is head of the
family and the woman must seek her husband's permission in order to
work. But that could be history soon.
Vying for membership of the European Union, Turkey is finally
revising its 75-year-old civil code to advance women's rights.
Parliament began debating a new code Wednesday and is expected to
vote on it later this month.
To join the 15-member EU, a country has to be a democracy and
have a free-market economy. It has to reform its legislation using
an EU manual of tens of thousands of pages.
Some of the provisions of Turkey's old code - like the one
requiring wives to seek their husbands' permission to work - are
rarely invoked. But women's groups say the code was influential in
shaping attitudes in the judiciary and among the public, especially
in poorer rural areas.
"The old code was the husbands' code," said Nukhet Sirman of
KADER, a group that aims to promote women in politics. "The new
code, at long last, formally recognizes that men and women are
equals."
If the changes are passed, they would take effect Jan. 1, 2002,
after endorsement by President Ahmet Necdet Sezer.
Although women's groups say the new code can be improved further,
they also welcome it for the advances it makes on the old code,
which is virtually unchanged since it was adopted in 1926.
Turkey adopted its old code from Swiss family law, replacing the
old Ottoman system which, for example, allowed a man to have more
than one wife or to repudiate a wife who was no longer in favor.
"It was the most modern code of its time, but it has been eroded
with time and no longer meets our social needs," said Kudret Guven,
professor of law at Ankara's Gazi University.
The draft new code scraps the phrase "the head of the marriage
union is the man," giving women the right to have a say in decisions
concerning the children or the family home. She no longer needs a
husband's consent to go out to work. But a person could ask his or
her spouse not to take up a job that would disrupt "calm in the
marriage union."
"People and societies change constantly and countries have to
pass laws to reflect those changes," said nationalist lawmaker
Ismail Kose in opening remarks to the assembly. "It is a significant
deficiency that the changes weren't made earlier."
The code also ensures that women are better off if there is a
divorce, guaranteeing that all assets accumulated during the union
are shared equally. Currently, a divorced woman is only entitled to
assets legally registered under her name.
On Wednesday, representatives of a dozen women's groups lobbied
politicians in parliament to ensure that the equal sharing of assets
is valid for all divorced couples. The women fear lawmakers could
restrict that law to couples who marry after January 2002.
But men get improvements, too, under the new code.
Men will be able to request alimony from wives who are better
off. A man can also drop his own surname and take his wife's if he
wishes, while the woman can use her maiden name only in connection
with her husband's family name.
The new code also raises the legal age for marriage to 18 from
the current 17 for men and 15 for women. It sets a legal separation
period of six months before couples can file for divorce.
The code also lowers the legal age for adopting children from 35
to 30 and allows a single parent to adopt.
In a predominantly Muslim country where unmarried couples living
together is still frowned upon, it makes no provisions for
cohabiting families. It does, however, grant out-of-wedlock
offspring the same inheritance rights as others.
It makes no mention of other 21st century issues such as
surrogate motherhood or homosexual marriages.
"The code will probably have to be revised again in 10 or 15
years," said Ilknur Yuksel of the women's rights group Flying Broom.
"But for the time being ... the draft is more or less
adequate." |