| By KIM CAMPBELL, The
Christian Science Monitor (April 5, 2000 12:03 a.m.
EDT http://www.nandotimes.com) - Houses may be messier
and parents may be sleepier, but that's a good
sign for kids. Across America, time spent in the
company of children has become the holy grail of
working parents - and it appears to be well
within their grasp.
By curtailing
everything from shut-eye to volunteer work to
vacuuming, most moms and dads today are finding
ways to put kids first, perhaps more consciously
than in earlier eras.
"Anytime
I'm not working, I'm with my kids," says
Pamela Alexander, a manager at Ford Motor Co. in
Deerborn, Mich. To have more hours with their two
girls, she and her husband hire out the
housecleaning and, instead of giving time to
charities, "I write big checks," she
says.
With dual-income
families now the norm, spending time with
children requires more creativity than it did
during the days of "Ozzie and Harriet."
Solutions vary - from staggered job schedules, to
one parent quitting work for a time, to dads
picking up more of the child-rearing
responsibility.
"We're in
the midst of an evolution, not a
revolution," says James Levine, director of
the Fatherhood Project at the Families
and Work Institute in New York.
For all their
efforts, most parents are managing to give kids
enough attention. Almost 7 in 10 children ages 8
to 18 surveyed said they get enough time with
their working parents, according to research by
Ellen Galinsky in her book "Ask the
Children: What America's Children Really Think
About Working Parents."
"It's often
a given that it's very selfish, greedy parents
who sacrifice their children at the altar of
their own materialism," says Galinsky, who
heads the Families and Work Institute. But
parents' perceptions that they need more time
with kids differs from what children actually
think, she says.
Changes in
technology and lifestyle patterns have certainly
helped parents eke out more family time. Fast
food and microwaves, for example, offer short
cuts for meal preparation. Children are also home
less often than they used to be, being pulled out
for activities like preschool, summer camp, and
swimming lessons. Couples today also have fewer
children than did their counterparts of recent
decades, allowing for more parental "face
time" per child.
Thanks to such
changes, mothers today spend about the same
amount of time with their children as mothers did
in the 1960s, according to new findings by
Suzanne Bianchi, a sociologist at the University
of Maryland. In 1998, women spent 5.8 waking
hours with their children each day, versus 5.6
hours for mothers in 1965. Fathers did even
better - increasing their time from 2.7 hours per
day in 1965 to 4 hours in 1998.
Indeed, dads are
the resource parents are drawing on most often to
make up for the time women are spending at the
office. Perhaps as a result, attitudes about
men's role in the family are gradually changing.
"When
fathers define success today, it's no longer just
in terms of being a breadwinner," says
Levine, author of "Working Fathers."
"It means being involved with the kids as
well."
Many mothers say
their husbands help with everything from folding
laundry to picking up kids after school. Fathers'
share of housework has increased in recent years,
too, with men taking over some of the duties
(although not half of them) from moms - both
working and nonworking.
Luvie Myers, a
stay-at-home mom in Winnetka, Ill., says her
husband can more easily leave work for a family
event than a father could have in her parents'
era. "Spending time with family is an excuse
at work that people are willing to accept,"
she says.
But workplaces
vary dramatically in their tolerance of family
needs - and parents must adapt accordingly.
Ford's Alexander says she sees few couples like
hers, in which both parents are in management and
work full time.
She and her
husband share the duties - and it's not a given
that she'll be the one to take care of any crisis
with the children.
Her husband,
Paul Jakabcsin, says that he doesn't see himself
as the family's breadwinner and that they work
hard to balance their time with the children.
They schedule carefully on weekends so they can
work on home projects during their daughters'
naps, for example.
Other working
dads are more like Richard Hulme of Framingham,
Mass. He helps out with his two young children
mainly on weekends. His wife works several
part-time jobs to help support the family and be
available for the children during the week.
"I wish I
could do more," he says, adding it is not
difficult to give up personal activities - like
exercising and taking courses - for his kids.
The theme of
self-sacrifice is the recurring one for today's
parents. Couples today have less time alone
together, less free time, and even less rest.
Judy Barker, a
self-employed forester and mother of two in
Missoula, Mont., gives up sleep to be with her
kids. She gets up early to finish projects she
puts off at night, when she is with her two
children, ages 11 and 14.
The University
of Maryland study included mothers who don't work
outside the home, like Myers - and it indicates
they are not leading their mothers' lives.
Parenting styles and lifestyles have changed too
much.
In the 1960s,
there were fewer organized activities, "no
soccer classes, theater classes," says
Myers. She recalls that she used to come home
from school and play outside with friends.
Today there is
"enormous pressure to have your child be
successful and good at all different
activities," she says.
All of this
means that parents - whether they are employed
outside the home or not - are preoccupied with
child-rearing. Whereas women in the 1960s stayed
home because it was what people did, "a sign
of middle-class status," now mothers stay
home "to take care of the kids - housework
is secondary," says Joan Williams, a
professor at American University in Washington
and author of the new book "Unbending
Gender."
Although the
University of Maryland study would indicate
working parents are succeeding at spending time
with children, it doesn't always feel that way to
strapped moms and dads. A 1997 study by the
Families and Work Institute showed that 70
percent of employed fathers and mothers do not
feel they have enough time with their children.
Sometimes,
couples decide it's just too hard - if not
impossible - to juggle work and children.
Kelly
Graves-Desai recently decided to leave her job as
editorial director of the Harvard Education
Letter in Cambridge, Mass., to be at home with
her two children.
"Time and
stress are the two reasons we decided to do
this," she says. "It just got crazy.
Neither one of us was giving enough time to our
jobs or our kids."
Having a parent
at home is advantageous, say some family
advocates. "In general, we're beginning to
see statistics that say more women are staying at
home with kids," says Janet Parshall,
spokeswoman for the Family Research Council, a
conservative group in Washington. "I'm
liking that. I think it's a trend that bodes well
for the future."
Other family
advocates, however, say the amount of time
parents spend with children isn't the only issue.
"Simply
looking at hours spent doesn't tell us what is
happening in that time," says Galinsky.
"The debate about time obscures the issue of
... how we're connecting with kids."
Her research
shows that 2 in 5 children ages 8 to 18 feel the
time they spend with their employed mothers and
fathers is rushed. Children want time to hang out
with parents, she says, as well as time when mom
and dad are focused on them.
"Critics of
parents set up one right way to do things,"
she says. Instead, the focus of any debates needs
to be on "obnoxious" parents in all
groups, and not just on the idea that, "they
work, and no one who works can be a good
parent."
|