By
Marilyn Henry
NEW YORK (March 19) - The Reform Movement's
rabbinical association is set to vote this week
on a controversial resolution that, while not
explicitly sanctioning gay marriage, will give
its blessing to rabbis who choose - or decline -
to officiate at same-gender ceremonies between
two Jews.
The resolution, which does not refer to such
unions as marriages, "supports giving
affirmation to gays and lesbians and the
relationships they form through appropriate
Jewish ritual," said Rabbi Paul Menitoff,
director of Reform's Central Conference of
American Rabbis.
It would be "groundbreaking because it
would be the first time a major religious body
will have indicated its support for any of its
clergy who decide to officiate at same-gender
ceremonies," Menitoff said Friday.
The CCAR, which represents about 1,800 Reform
rabbis in North America, will begin its annual
convention on Thursday in Greensboro, North
Carolina.
The vote is due a week after the Vermont state
assembly authorized the widest array of rights
and privileges for same-sex couples in the US.
By a narrow margin, it passed a bill Thursday
that would create "civil unions" of gay
and lesbian couples.
The Vermont measure, which is expected to pass
the state senate next month, does not call the
unions "marriages," but it would give
these couples virtually all the benefits of
marriage, including family leave and specific
rights in child custody.
The Vermont bill said the state "has a
strong interest in promoting stable and lasting
families, including families based upon a
same-sex couple."
The Reform Movement's resolution uses
comparable language. It says that "committed
same-gender relationships between two Jews... can
serve as the foundation of stable Jewish
families, thus adding strength to the Jewish
community."
Menitoff said the prospects for the resolution
are very good, although there are passionate
feelings on both sides. The resolution will be
introduced by the Women's Rabbinic Network,
comprising 275 women CCAR members.
The Reform Movement, which some outsiders
perceive as anarchic, is accustomed to people
following their consciences, and there was no
discernible discomfort with a resolution that
said either stance on officiation was fine.
However, because some Reform rabbis already
officiate at such ceremonies, there were
questions about why a resolution was necessary.
It also appeared that the resolution's passage
would widen the breach between American and
Israeli Reform rabbis. However, Menitoff said:
"We are living in a very different culture
than they are, and they understand why we are
confronting this, and will understand that if
this decision passes, it is aimed primarily at
North America and comes out of a North American
context."
The Reform Movement's vote comes only two
months after more than 800 members of the clergy,
primarily liberal Christians and Reform rabbis,
signed a declaration on sexual morality calling
on all faiths to bless same-sex couples and
permit gay and lesbian ministers.
The resolution does not refer to marriage, but
to "officiation at same-gender
ceremonies." What those events are called is
up to the individual rabbi and the couple.
"A rabbi may call it a commitment
ceremony and the couple may choose to label it a
marriage," Menitoff said.
It does, however, specify that the union is
between two Jewish partners, and appears to rule
out rabbinic officiation at interfaith
same-gender ceremonies.
"The reality on the ground is that rabbis
who don't officiate at mixed marriages certainly
would not officiate at one of these ceremonies
that involve a Jew and a non-Jew," Menitoff
said.
"While the majority of our rabbis do not
officiate at mixed marriages, we have a
percentage of our rabbis who do," he said,
noting that rabbis who officiate at mixed
marriage would likely follow that practice for a
same-gender couple.
|