By
Daniel B. Wood
The Christian Science Monitor
L O S A
N G E L E S, Dec. 3
In
just one generation, attitudes toward
marriage and family have shifted so
dramatically that the very fabric of
society has been inexorably altered
leaving pundits and ordinary
Americans alike struggling to ascertain
whether the changes are progressive or
destructive.
To be sure,
marriage retains a high regard among
Americans: More than 90 percent say it is
a highly desirable goal. But with more
people delaying matrimony, divorcing, or
avoiding wedlock altogether, its standing
as the norm has slipped.
The change holds
major implications, especially for the
composition of American families. Only 1
in 4 households now contain married
couples with children, down from 45
percent in 1972 a transformation
that affects everything from
child-rearing to government policies
aimed at families.
Liberals and
conservatives offer different
explanations for the sea change in views
on marriage and family.
There is
truth to both sides, but the issue that
is getting squeezed out of the middle is,
What do we value? says
David Blankenhorn of the Institute for
American Values, a think tank that is
collaborating with scholars to study the
transformation. More Unmarried Moms
Two studies released in the past month
give a new urgency to their work. First,
the U.S. Census released figures showing
that, for the first time, the majority of
women becoming pregnant with or giving
birth to their first child are unmarried.
Then, last week a survey by the
University of Chicagos National
Opinion Research Center (NORC) found just
one-quarter of U.S. households are made
up of married couples with children, down
from 45 percent in the 1970s.
Trends that took
off in the 1960s such as sexual
permissiveness, the large-scale movement
of women into the workplace, and the
liberalization of divorce laws are
often cited as reasons fewer Americans
now fall under the heading of
married with children. Some
of the statistical shift, of course, is
explained by demographics: As people live
longer, they are more likely to be
widowed.
The
transformation, say observers in fields
from sociology to law, has led to a deep
schism between those who welcome it and
those who lament an erosion of
traditional values. But a growing number
of people on both sides say the issue
simply must be addressed with new laws
and other mechanisms that reflect, or
stall, such change. Such an examination
would affect social policies from
flex-time to day care, from welfare to
subsidized housing.
At the core of
the issue, agree social scientists, are
shifting values. Many say the figures
warn of a societal weakening of norms
connecting marriage with childbearing.
They spotlight a loosening of familial
stability for children, which decades of
research shows is heavily dependent on
the steady presence of a father and
mother.
I am
astonished by these findings and find
nothing but bad omens for children,
says David Popenoe, a sociologist at
Rutgers University in New Jersey and
co-director of the National Marriage
Project. Decades of social research
clearly show that the risk factors for
children from nonintact families is on
the order of two to three times as high
in anything you can name from
dropping out of school ... to entering a
bad marriage of their own.
The forces that
contribute to greater societal acceptance
of out-of-wedlock births, divorce, and
single parenting, are many and
they tend to feed on one another,
sociologists say.
Young people
contemplating marriage, for instance, may
themselves be the product of a divorced
family and, therefore, be more wary of
tying the knot.
Laws that made
divorce easier, which came into vogue in
the late 1960s, have made the experience
less harrowing for many couples. The
stigma once attached to divorce has also
faded.
Better
employment opportunities for women have
also paved the way for them to leave bad
or tepid marriages whereas
previous generations of women with few
job options would have stayed in such
unions.
Consequences
of 1960s
We are now living out the
consequences of the liberalization of
attitudes that started with more open
sexuality in the 1960s, says
Phyllis Cohen of the Canoga Park, Calif.,
chapter of Parents Without Partners,
which counsels single parents.
Its hard to go back to
something so strict ... when the
prevailing view is relaxed on all these
things.
Others hasten to
add that some of the statistics can be
misleading. For instance, while 18.3
percent of children live with single
parents, a much higher rate than in 1972,
the figure has dropped since 1985, when
it was 25 percent.
Statistical
quibbling aside, many observers say the
numbers point to a need to educate the
next generation about the meaning and
importance of marriage.
Maggie
Gallagher, author of a recent report
called The Age of Unwed
Mothers, sees a new willingness
among young people to separate parenthood
from marriage, magnifying a more subtle
attitude shift in the larger society.
For three
decades we have been declaring war on
teen pregnancy by telling teen [girls] to
wait to have a baby ... until they
graduate or become adult, she says.
But we havent told them to
wait until they get married. As a
result, out-of-wedlock births are now
increasing among middle-class white women
between the ages of 18 and 28.
These
youths are not hostile to or uninterested
in marriage, says Ms. Gallagher.
They just dont see the
relationship to making a family.
She adds, They see [marriage] as a
symbol of true love that doesnt
have anything to do with having a baby.
Its really quite
extraordinary.
Me
First Trumps Marriage
Several top scholars also see a societal
shift away from marriage as a covenant
that couples enter for the sake of the
greater society to a more personalized
contract between two people. We are
reaping the consequences of the me
first society where the needs of
the individual are taking priority,
Mr. Blankenhorn says. Thirty to 40
years ago, marriage was viewed as an
institution bigger than themselves, that
they were expected to conform to. Now
they think of marriage as a private
relationship between two alone.
Some evidence
exists that this trend is slowing and, in
some quarters, even declining. Several
states, including Louisiana, Arizona, and
Florida, have instituted tougher divorce
laws or other incentives to prepare
couples for enduring marriage. Others are
examining tax codes to remove
disincentives to marriage, and welfare
laws that give benefits to unwed mothers.
But many
observers say the causes of change are
too broad to be captured in isolated or
piecemeal legislation. They urge a
broader rethinking of marriage as a
veritable cornerstone of a sound and
progressive society.
All this
is just one more reminder that we are
living in the midst of a massive social
experiment, says Mary Ann Glendon,
a law professor at Harvard University in
Cambridge, Mass. We have a
historically unprecedented proportion of
children growing up in circumstances that
are not optimal for producing healthy,
well-adjusted persons, and they will be
basis of our future political and
economic system. Thats really the
problem. 
Copyright
1999 The Christian Science Monitor. All
rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
|