|
Tuesday, June 29, 1999
By Mary Jordan Washington Post Service TOKYO - Mayu does not know yet, but there
is little chance she will ever leave this three-story children's
home, where she has lived since her mother abandoned her when
she was three years old. For now, the 8-year-old still senses
possibilities.
Chieko and Tadao Sato, who have no children after 10 years
of marriage, desperately want to adopt her. They have brought
her to their home, taken her shopping for holidays and filled
her empty days with ice cream and love. Mayu loves being with
them, and the director of the children's home believes it would
be a wonderful match. But he knows it is a nearly impossible
one.
Many people in Japan have a deep aversion to adoption, even
though the practice has become a cherished way of creating families
in much of the world. Japanese culture places a great emphasis
on blood relations, so for many Japanese someone else's child
would never feel like true family.
There is a growing number of couples with attitudes similar
to the Satos', but they are still the exception. Extended family
ties are strong in Japan, and relatives often care for each other's
children when the need arises. But when that is not possible
- for financial or other reasons - many relatives would rather
see these children in state homes than adopted by strangers.
As a result, Mayu and 25,000 others who live in Japan's 527
state-run or subsidized children's homes do not really belong
to any family. They arrive at these homes because they were abandoned,
neglected or abused by their biological parents. And there they
live as Japan's invisible children, rarely discussed in public,
and subtly discriminated against in private. In a nation where
fitting in and being like everybody else is valued, growing up
in a state home can make it hard to find a job, to get married,
or to just be a kid.
''Many Japanese with a conscience know we could take better
care of these 25,000 children,'' said Yasuhiko Yuzawa, chairman
of a nonprofit group of scholars and officials studying adoption.
But as a rule, people feel no need to help them: ''People think
they are the responsibility of the state.''
Many here defend Japan's system of caring for abandoned children.
They say that Japan has far fewer children in state care than
do many other countries, most notably the United States. And
those children are generally well cared for, safe and guaranteed
a high school education.
''Maybe it's a difference of culture,'' said Yoshio Murakami,
a child care official of the Tokyo metropolitan government. ''I
can't say that being with an adoptive family is the best thing
for the kids in these facilities.''
Minoru Katoda, who runs the children's facility where Mayu
lives, said the lost opportunities to create loving family lives
for these children ''is the worst part of Japanese obsession
with blood relations.''
An unusually outspoken advocate for children, Mr. Katoda allowed
a reporter and photographer access to his home for children under
the condition that it not be identified by name and that the
privacy of the 50 children there be guarded. Tokyo government
officials also allowed access to another facility where 110 children
live. Many of those interviewed - adoption advocates, doctors,
social workers, and the children themselves - believe that Mayu's
predicament explains much about Japanese reluctance to adopt,
and how that philosophy condemns thousands of children to a life
in limbo.
In Japan, blood and money remain the chief motivators behind
adoption. Most of those adopted in Japan are adult males, typically
to carry on an heirless elderly couple's family name in exchange
for their inheritance. Often, grandchildren are adopted as a
legal way to dodge inheritance tax.
The Japanese koseki, official documents held by the government
that mark birth, marriage, death and other milestones, have tremendous
importance. Traditionally, divorce and adoption were seen as
tarnishing these records, and, by extension, one's identity.
A law enacted in 1988 allowed young adopted children to have
their birth family name erased from their koseki and replaced
by their adoptive family's name. Before this, both names were
listed, which essentially meant ''adopted'' was stamped in bold
letters on this important record. The new law was meant to make
it easier for families to adopt nonrelatives without fear of
stigma.
But things have not changed quickly. Many Japanese view their
families as a privileged, almost sacred group. Western families,
particularly American ones, are seen by Japanese as careless
with that privilege. In their view, American families often start
out of wedlock, end in divorce and often accept a stranger's
child as their own through adoption. In Japan, millions of people
see these actions as scandalous, or at the least, not to be discussed
in public.
That is why the true number of adoptions between unrelated
families is impossible to find here - there is a public face
and a private reality. An estimated 65,000 adoptions of unrelated
children occur each year in the United States. The official number
in Japan is about 600. The true number is believed to be significantly
higher, but still only a fraction of that in most Western countries.
Many Japanese adoptions occur surreptitiously, with children
handed off privately between families, sometimes with the help
of a doctor, lawyer or broker who - for a price - will fake a
birth certificate. Akira Koizumi, a spokesman for the Japan Medical
Association, dismissed the notion of doctors playing such a role,
calling it ''all hearsay.''
But in interviews with young couples who want to adopt, many
said they were instructed to turn quietly to obstetricians. The
doctor who delivers unwanted babies in one room and witnesses
the sadness of a miscarriage in another sometimes operates by
the shadow rules, many here say.
Kazuko Yokota, who runs Motherly Network, a private adoption
agency, said she believed doctors quietly help broker the adoptions
of ''hundreds of children'' each year. ''It's all done in secret,''
she said. ''Adoption is not the Japanese way.'' As a result,
she said, some people go to great lengths - even moving to a
place where they are not known, and feigning pregnancies with
pillows - to conceal an adoption.
Young couples are slowly becoming more willing to adopt children.
But even as the demand grows, the supply of available children
is constricted by relatives who will not take the children in,
but who refuse to let them go.
Relatives can hold out hope that a family will someday reunite.
Quite often, there is simply an emotional rejection of adoption
as unnatural.
Mayu's aunt is her legal guardian. Her mother, who was not
married when she gave birth, raised Mayu until she was almost
four, and then, one day, dropped her off at a friend's house
and vanished. That was the last Mayu heard from her mother. Now,
her aunt, her mother's older sister, is her legal guardian, but
no one at the children's home remembers the aunt coming to visit
in four years.
But the aunt has made it clear she does not want Mayu to be
adopted. Government social workers say the aunt has not explained
why she is blocking the adoption, but they say her stance is
typical. Despite repeated efforts, the aunt could not be reached
to comment.
So Mayu waits, in a home that is spotless and well equipped,
full of television and Ping-Pong and other children - but not
a single picture of a mother or a father. ''In these facilities,
the children have everything materially that they need,'' Mr.
Katoda said. ''But the facilities are no substitute for the most
important thing: love.''
Chieko Sato is waiting, too, hoping for a chance to plead
her case directly to Mayu's aunt, to ''demonstrate in front of
her how much we love her.''
She hates the stories she hears about how Mayu becomes so
sad when other children at the home receive phone calls from
relatives. The Satos have given Mayu a phone card she can use
to call them. ''It makes us love her more,'' said Miss Sato,
39, who sews handbags in her home for a living, while her husband,
40, works as a supervisor in a plastics factory. Mayu and the
other thousands of children in these homes are labeled in whispers
on the playground as ''the children from the facilities.''
The homes have no budget for cram schools or private tutors,
and so they do not spend after-school hours as the majority of
their classmates do. They would have to pay for college themselves,
so virtually no one goes. Typically, one day, between the ages
of 18 and 20, they walk out on their own. |