|
Tuesday, March 30, 1999
Q Two years ago, I sent my 14-year-old daughter to a wilderness
program. After numerous attempts at counseling, we felt this
intervention was necessary. She did well for eight months. She
was diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). At first
she did well after leaving the program, but now she has relapsed
and is in trouble with the police. She is looking at one year
on probation, which includes mandatory counseling. I have wondered
if she had ADD, but after reading one of your columns, I'm beginning
to suspect an inherited mood disorder.
K.B.
A Gather as much information as you can about your daughter's
disorder and the options available for effective treatment. Counseling
alone may not be effective.
In the book ``Straight Talk about Psychiatric Medications for
Kids,'' author Timothy Wilens, M.D., discusses the effectiveness
of treating children who suffer from serious disorders with medication.
Medication often helps stabilize moods, which enables individuals
to obtain greater benefits from counseling.
Study the family history and note problem behaviors, including
alcohol or drug abuse, rage disorders, obsessive-compulsive behavior,
depression and mood swings. Individuals often inherit a vulnerability
to a disorder from the gene pool.
Contact a physician or psychiatrist who is knowledgeable about
treatment options. Ask your county mental health association
for referrals.
In the past, faulty parenting was thought to be the cause
of schizophrenia, autism, panic attacks, depression, obsessive-compulsive
disorder and many other conditions. We were wrong about this.
Parents don't create these problems, but they do have to recognize
them and seek effective treatment.
Q My 9-year-old son was suspended March 5 (pending an administrative
hearig scheduled for April 15) from the San Jose Unified School
District for violating California Education Code section 48900,
which states no student shall possess a knife or other dangerous
object. The knife in question is around two inches long, to my
son nothing more than a toy. The knife fell out of his pocket
when he was in the library. This extended suspension seems too
severe for a 9-year-old who meant no harm. My son is not malicious
and does not pose a danger to others. I believe what my son did
was wrong and there should be consequences. However, I feel there
should be more flexibility for individual cases. Can you offer
any advice?
No name
A Dr. Jack Smith, a former school administrator and current
school board member, states that a principal has the authority
to determine if an administrative hearing is warranted when a
zero-tolerance policy has been violated. A violation of a ``no
knives'' policy brings automatic suspension, which stays in force
until a parent conference is held. The principal has the authority
to determine if the violation involved danger to others, or intent
to harm or threaten.
If he/she determines there was no danger, the suspension can
be lifted after the conference. The principal is required to
write a letter to the district's board of education explaining
his/her actions in the case.
Suspending a child for five weeks before any determination
is made regarding the seriousness of the offense seems unreasonable.
If your son's district does not allow the principal to determine
the seriousness of the offense, use his situation to work for
an application of the policy that would require an immediate
review of a ``weapon at school'' case.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathleen Brown is a licensed psychologist who has been counseling
individuals and families for more than 20 years. Write her care
of Silicon Valley Life, Mercury News, 750 Ridder Park Drive,
San Jose, Calif. 95190. Send e-mail to cabrown500@aol.com
San Jose Mercury News |