| January 13, 1999 My
name is Richard Wilkins. I am a Professor of Law
at Brigham Young University and one of the
Directors of NGO Family Voice. I have a few
preliminary details to address, and then it will
be my honor to welcome you formally.
You
should have received a packet of information upon
arrival at the hotel, supplemented by various
materials received at registration this morning.
I will touch upon a few matters covered in that
information, clarifying some details of the
Forum.
First,
if you have any questions regarding your stipend,
housing, or transportation, please contact
Florence Beal at the registration desk.
Second,
we wish to make every effort to accommodate the
needs of those who are celebrating the Holy Month
of Ramadan. An Al Eftar meal will be provided at
sunset each evening, and we have arranged prayer
facilities here at the Conference Center. Please
advise me or Bachar Jamali of any additional
special needs you may have. I also want to extend
special thanks to Mr. Jamali, who has worked
tirelessly the past six weeks pulling together
various details of this Forum.
Third,
we have scheduled optional activities each
evening and on Saturday. Tonight, there will be a
banquet and entertainment at the Sky Room.
Thursday evening there will be a special western
dinner and show in Salt Lake City at the Wagon
Master Restaurant, hosted by the Eden-Barn
Corporation. Friday evening, the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints has invited you to
attend a special dinner at the Joseph Smith
Memorial Building in Salt Lake City. That dinner
will be hosted by Elder M. Russell Ballard.
Saturday, we offer sightseeing and skiing
opportunities, followed by an early dinner at my
home. These events are discretionary, and you are
free to attend (or not) as your interest (and
energy) permits. I am well enough acquainted with
international travel to know that you may need
simply to rest. For planning purposes, however,
we would like you to indicate on the form
included in your welcome packet which of the
above events you desire to attend. We hope those
who have already enjoyed an Al Eftar meal will
nevertheless join us for dinner, or at least
pleasant conversation, each evening.
Fourth,
we hope that many of you have prepared 10-minute
statements to exchange during the second and
third day of the Forum. We also hope that many of
you have brought printed copies of those remarks.
We would like to schedule times for those who
have prepared a statement. In the lobby, during
the lunch break and following the afternoon
session, there will be a "Presentation Sign
Up Sheet." If you would like to be assigned
a time to present your remarks on Thursday or
Friday, please sign that list. Also, give a copy
of your prepared remarks to Marya Reed. Your
remarks will then be copied and distributed to
all Forum participants.
Finally,
we are videotaping portions of the Forum and have
engaged a stenographic reporter to record our
discussions. We hope to present you with a
summary of our discussions at the conclusion of
the Forum. We will also be able to provide a
complete transcript of the Forum's proceedings
upon request.
It
is now my pleasure to welcome you.
On
behalf of Brigham Young University and NGO Family
Voice, I welcome you to the First World Family
Policy Forum. It is a unique honor to have you
here. The 65 participants at this first Forum
come from some 25 nations, and hold numerous
positions of importance (ranging from Ambassadors
to Heads of National Women's Bureaus) within the
United Nations System and domestic political
structures. As such, you bring a wealth of
experience, expertise and influence on issues
related to the family. We hope that you will use
your experience and expertise to sharpen and
inform the discussions that will span the next
three days, and that you will hereafter use the
results of our discussions to influence
positively the circumstances of families
throughout the world.
Strengthening
the world's families is a task that demands
urgent attention. On the cover of your binder is
a reproduction of a thoughtful painting by
well-known Utah artist Brian Kershisnik. The
painting, entitled "Large Horse Small
Riders," dramatizes the state of hope and
peril in which the families of the world now find
themselves. The painting, poetically described
inside your binder, merits careful consideration.
I quote the description of the painting:
The
smallness of this family in proportion to their
mode of travel is striking.
Their
diminutive stature renders emphatic the
largeness, the significance of their journey. The
water is wide, and deep...
The
water that surrounds the families of the world is
indeed wide and deep. Recently, a reporter for a
Salt Lake City newspaper interviewed me regarding
adoption policy. The reporter asked me whether I
believed it was wise to place adoptive children
with adults living in
"nontraditional" arrangements,
including same-sex relationships. I responded,
simply, that most research demonstrates that
children do best in traditional, well-functioning
intact families. I pointed out that, for ideal
development, children need the positive role
models provided by an effective and loving father
and an effective and loving mother. The resulting
newspaper article more or less accurately
reflected my statements, although (by comparing
them to a 40-year old television show) the
article suggested that the traditional family was
rather old-fashioned and (perhaps) even
fictitious.
My
apparently quaint statements were then contrasted
with the more "modem" opinion of a
professor of social work who warned that
"broad generalizations" about what is
best for children are positively dangerous.
"Kids are going to suffer from a policy if
we make generalizations about any kind of
people," he said. He then asserted that the
only real problem that would be faced by children
adopted by a homosexual couple would be the fact
that "we're in a homophobic society."
He suggested that proper counseling would avoid
any possible difficulties that children would
encounter living in a home with two parents of
the same sex.
This
afternoon we will hear from experts who will
examine whether or not the views of this
professor of social work are accurate. I defer
substantive comment to that time. My present
point is limited. Just a short time ago, in a
discussion with a newspaper reporter, I made
several statements that hardly would have raised
an eyebrow a generation ago. Children are best
served in stable families headed by both a father
and a mother. Nothing in the past generation,
moreover, has demonstrated this statement to be
erroneous. On the contrary, study after study
demonstrates that children thrive in such an
environment. Nevertheless, in 1999, as we face a
new millennium, any preference for a stable,
two-parent family is labeled a "dangerous
generalization" that, oddly enough, might
harm our children.
How
did we reach this point? How did the water that
surrounds the family become so deep? In part,
because national and international policy makers
have not paid enough attention to the fundamental
importance of the traditional family. Also, in
part, because other policy makers (and sadly, the
academic community) have busily undermined the
social norms that support the traditional
family. Let me give you one recent illustration.
This
past summer, at the UN Conference for the
Creation of an Intemational Criminal Court,
language was introduced that - had it been
retained in the final draft statute - might well
have swamped the little family on the large
horse. Among other things, the draft statute
proceeded on the assumption that
"gender" is a "social
construct unrelated to such standard (and
purportedly limiting) notions as "male"
and "female." Beginning from this
premise, various proposed "crimes"
contained in the draft statute attacked the
traditional conception of marriage as a
relationship between a man and a woman, laid the
groundwork for dramatic diminution of parental
rights, threatened the very notion of the human
family by criminalizing pregnancy, and took aim
at the world's great traditional religions.
But,
despite the peril, the effort to undermine
family, religion and traditional morality at the
International Criminal Court Conference did not
(at least for the time being) succeed. The
sociological claim that "gender" is a
mere social construct based solely on
"learned behavior" was resoundingly
defeated. Gender, instead, was defined as
"male" and "female." The
final statute does not, as did the original, make
pregnancy a crime. Language that could have
criminalized a state's refusal to recognize
same-sex marriage was deleted, and the
possibility that traditional religious leaders
could be prosecuted for the crime of
"persecution" was reduced.
But,
while the statute of the International Criminal
Court did not (at least for now) deepen the water
that surrounds our little family, it could have
deepened that water. It is to forestall and
prevent such deepening that Brigham Young
University has convened this World Family Policy
Forum.
The
distinguished presenters you will hear during the
next three days will identify threats to our
little family on the water, and propose possible
solutions to aid their journey. It is our
profound hope that you will add your own
observations, drawn from your own cultural
perspectives,to further refine the ideas proposed
by academic and policy experts.
We
come together from various cultures, from diverse
faiths, to discuss, to listen, and to learn from
each other. The waters that surround our little
family are indeed wide and deep. Those waters
flow swiftly. But, as the description of Mr.
Kershisnik's painting concludes, the horse upon
which our family rides:
is
broad and strong. [The family's] peril is
intimate, horrifyingly large and absolute. But
they know their way, and their helper is
sufficient to the task.
I look
forward to the next three days as we work
together to become more sufficient to the task of
assisting the families of the world through the
water.
|