| I come from Brazil,
the largest country in South America, and also a
country of immigrants. As I look at your name
badges I recognize countries of origin of the
ancestors of many of today's Brazilians. I myself
feel honored to claim-as far as my genealogical
research has shown--a variety of ancestries from
Africa, Europe, and the Middle East. And as far
as religious background, I come from a Catholic
upbringing, Afro-Brazilian spiritualism, and now
almost 27 years as a member of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. About two
years ago I was approached by a lady who inquired
what my views were on the attacks on the family
caused by legislation and decisions made at the
highest level in world forums. At that time,
after finishing a multi-year large-scale study on
a completely unrelated topic, I couldn't help but
to disclose my ignorance on the subject. Today, I
reflect on that conversation and wonder how many
among the world's population are aware of the
problem.
We live in a large world. Reports from the
Population Division of the United Nations state
that by July of l999 the world population should
reach the mark of 6 billion persons. There are
362 cities in the world with populations at or
above 1 million inhabitants, and a little over
3,000 cities with populations around 100,000 or
above. The total population living in these large
cities totals about 1 billion individuals. The
remaining population who lives in smaller cities
would be sufficient to fill 39,000 cities of
25,000 inhabitants.
When we consider these numbers, it becomes
clear that informing the world is an enormous
task. But it is not impossible. Dr. Siga Fatima
Jagne told me that even in remote villages in the
Gambia one can find fans of retired basketball
superstar Michael Jordan. That fact brings to
mind that the only way to spread information to
large numbers in today's world is through mass
media.
Perhaps one of the most remarkable
characteristics of the late 20' century is the
rapid rate of technological change with the
accompanying availability and accessibility of
affordable cuttingedge products to larger
numbers. Technology is not an evil in itself It
can be used for evil purposes, but when placed in
the hands of conscientious persons it can produce
good for all.
As we heard time and again in this forum,
well-organized and well-funded groups have been
active in trying to destroy the foundation of our
societies. With the possibility of even greater
influence of these groups looming in the horizon,
we clearly see that concern and action are
mandatory for those who want to preserve the
family as an institution.
Speed of action is a must, and I propose that
the walls that traditionally separated us must be
torn down, so we can achieve the common objective
of saving the family.
Since in the past 2 days we heard a number of
quotes from the sacred Koran, from the Bible, and
from Greek philosophers, allow me to share with
you a lesson from an additional sacred source of
the Latter-day Saints, the Book of Mormon.
In the ancient American continent, close to
2,000 years ago, a large nation of God-fearing
people faced possible extinction or enslavement
from a powerful enemy. Although the odds were
against them, rather than succumb they decided to
fight this formidable enemy with an equally
formidable strategy. So, their leaders
congregated the people in one body in their main
city, gathering provisions to survive a siege
that might be prolonged for several years. Being
thus united, in a few years they were able to
completely destroy that formidable enemy and
restore peace and prosperity to their homeland.
This account from the Book of Mormon (3 Nephi
chapters 3 & 4) suggests that in order to
defeat a formidable foe the people must unite,
joining their resources, talents, skills, and
prayers. I believe that the same must happen in
our struggle to avert the tide that threatens the
family.
In our discussions in these past 2 days I felt
that it should be mentioned that as far as our
strategy to accomplish our goal is concerned, we
must be united and not divided.
In my opinion, in order to accomplish our goal
we must concentrate more on top-level ideas than
on particulars. We heard many insights on
specific problems faced by several countries and
regions within countries. However, I propose that
while developing policy at the highest (or
worldwide) forums of discussion we should argue
for universal goals rather than specific policies
aimed at addressing regional circumstances.
Then, after winning support for these
universals, or fundamental ideas, we can together
pool our intellectual resources and as friends
and colleagues help each other translate those
ideas into practical policies addressed at each
country's reality.
|